AM Relevance: 10 Steps to Fix AM’s Problems
     
print  rss 

One in a series of responses from readers to RW’s Sept. 1 article exploring whether AM radio is "still relevant."

Radio World in recent issues has asked, "Is AM radio relevant?" Previously they’ve asked, "Is the FCC relevant?" I’m sure you would have had a bigger response if you’d asked if shortwave radio or ham radio is relevant.

Since Radio World is read widely in many radio stations, I’d like to address not only engineers but talent, PDs, managers and owners.

I can’t help get an AM radio application built into a cellphone without wireless Internet or a 60-foot antenna attached to an iPod, so my comments are limited to what we can do today, with the equipment that now exists.

To fix AM’s problems, we have to take a 10-step approach.

Mark Heller. ‘Nothing is as sweet as a well-run AM signal that someone actually cares about. When you hear it, you know.’ Photo by Tim Swoboda
Nothing is as sweet as a well-run AM signal that someone actually cares about. When you hear it, you know. Unfortunately, they’re not as prevalent as they were 30 years ago.

Mother Nature has always affected AM broadcasts when lightning was involved. But today, man-made devices interfere around the clock. Sodium vapor lights, farm fences that are electrified, aging power transformers and even the common personal computer monitor affect us.

Here are some "nuts and bolts" solutions. Not the latest, shiniest thing. We in broadcasting sometimes chase after things that sparkle, are new and trendsetting. Roll up your sleeves, and feel free to cross the items off as you complete the list.
  1. The 5 kHz reduction of audio of recent years was a disaster. It was started by one major group and others quickly followed in lock step. You’ve surrendered your bandwidth for the benefit of a few IBOC operators.

    Here’s a little-known secret. AM radio does not have to be all-talk or all-sports. Music can be played on AM radios.

    Put your radio station back at your original specs, according to FCC rules, the way the transmitter manufacturer worked so hard to build it. The guys who invented AM radio never wanted it to sound like a police scanner. Knock it off! Your advertisers with music beds and singing jingles will appreciate it, too.
  2. Frequency synchronization has been patented for AM radio carriers at least twice since 2001. It came out of Oak Ridge, Tenn., and the University of Tennessee.

    Simply put, end the fluttering noise at night on AM with every one of the licensed frequencies, coordinated using a GPS device to stay exactly on frequency. Listeners know the difference, especially at night. P.S. It’s not expensive to do, either.
  3. Power levels on AM must be legal and honest. If you have a license that says 11 watts at night and you are running 125 watts, you deserve to get fined. You are contributing to the overall noise at night. If you are the manager or licensee, ask your engineer how he computes your nighttime power.
  4. Doing high school sports on AM with a simple cellphone? Grow up!

    Just because your station has a trade-out with a cell provider doesn’t mean you have to do four-hour remotes with "tin-can" audio. Dust off your Marti transmitter. Find that Comrex audio extender. If you can’t afford the latest "near-studio-quality" equipment, check out the used items on eBay or from your audio dealer’s used inventory.

    It’s OK to put a cellphone on the air at an emergency or breaking news like an accident, but stop kidding yourself.
  5. A major issue is expanded-band AMs that kept the original frequencies they were supposed to give up. Please explain how 80 broadcasters were given a new frequency and, to win them, were graded on how much interference their current old AM signal caused; then, after five years, they kept the original frequency as well.

    There is a small corner in hell reserved for these licensees. The expanded band was created exclusively to clean up interference in the rest of the AM band.
  6. IBOC at night didn’t work, doesn’t work and won’t work. Turn it off at night until a fix is found and proven.

    Citadel Media, one of the early adapters, was sensitive to their adjacent neighbors and did the right thing. They deserve a lot of credit for their common sense.
  7. When was the last time you "proofed" your AM station?

    I don’t mean getting that annual 20-minute drive by R.F. Emission Measurement, either. Take the station down on a Sunday night and proof the audio chain with a tone, including the processor, and check your connections on the ATU at the antenna.

    I’m betting your answer to the question is, "I can’t remember." Proof it!
  8. The next two points have a political overtone. They need to be said.

    NRSC standards were adopted back in the 1980s to address solid-state florescent bulbs, solid-state vapor lights and other interference. It’s time to reconvene this group. Some of the original members of this group have either passed away or long since retired from the business.
  9. Marathon, Fla., has one AM station, with a directional array pointed away from the U.S. It’s time to make a deal to make it go away.

    It’s not an FCC problem, either. We as loyal broadcasters stood mostly silent while our government attempted to reach Cuba with up to 100 kilowatts from this station, only to have Cuba successfully jam more than one frequency back at us. That jamming continues today. Write your congressman. The NAB and SBE right now don’t care.
  10. Finally, to managers and program directors: You’re busy giving away concert tickets, free pizzas and the kitchen sink on your FM station to maintain your cume and share of audience. When are you going to do this with your AM station?

    One of my colleagues says, "All that AM needs after these corrections is one ‘gangbuster’ promotion, more than giving away a box of cereal or tickets to a minor-league baseball team." Do something dramatic.

Mark Heller is president and general manager of WGBW Radio in Two Rivers, Wis.

print  rss 

Rating People: 2   Average Rating:     
Comment List:

It may well be time to bring back the clears, giving the heritage Class A's up to 1000 kW power, and move the Class D's on clears and regionals to an expanded FM band. I've noticed big power is run in Europe and Asia for national coverage.No IBOC either.Run audio back out to the 10 kHz limit.
By Dave Gardiner on 9/21/2011
The truth is that AM is a media that could be viable for many more years! But it has to be "re-invent" it self, as the lack of creative programming of the present has stalled the "AM listeners" from hitting the AM mode button of their receivers! Talk radio is no way the De facto solution for getting listeners attention, but its ruther the solution for sending them away from AM! Radio has to stay an entertaining and informative media alltogether, and not just the one side or the other at all! AM STEREO (C-QUAM Analog system) was, and IMHO still is, the best way/solution to make AM broads more pleasant for the common listener, without trying to conviced him to throw out any old radios to get the Digi-zaster newer radios, just to listen the exact same programming material, that could easily hear with the older lower value radios, that he was forced to get rid off!!! The C-QUAM did work at day & night also while it wasn't an expensive system to install and mostly, to work with all time long, while the IBOC is too expensive both to install and even worst, to keep it running every year (maybe the term "annual fees" makes it more attractive) for the most smaller broaders. And till IBOC at AM seems to have huge problems, mostly during the night. So why somebody will turn off its CQUAM AM STEREO exciter at a radio station, just to force their listeners to buy the new HD radios? AM could have a real good quality if the stations kept their AM STEREO CQUAM systems on! Not CD quality of course, but far better than currently available, STILL monophonic, Digi-Analog and vice versa, changeover that HD radios do almost anytime!
By Pdmtr on 10/20/2009
Great comments. Run AM back out to 10.2KHz frequency response curve. The FCC should have mandated minimum receiver standards for AM radios instead of IBOC. The FCC should mandate DSP noise blankers, adjustable bandwidth (auto and/or manual), C-Quam stereo (or even an option for Kahn for that matter - with automatic switching), "AMAX" standards as it were for any AM radio to meet these standards that have FM stereo. Oh, and most important, after these items are done - in 2 years or less, put some innovative programming on your AM, like music programmed by some college kids. Remember FM radio in 1972? - make your AM station like that today, using those programming formulas in the 70's that made FM so well known. AM still has it in it, and I wouldn't mind the FCC revisiting "SuperPower" stations for a dozen clear channels in the USA with 750KW - 1MW from a national security standpoint, WLW, WJR, KOA, WLS, KHJ, WWL, WBZ, etc should all have 'super power status' - in analog stereo, NOT IBOC. Let's make it easy for the FCC - if your AM call sign is only 3 letters long, you get as much power as you want. And don't forget, put some innovative music programming on your AM! AM was the king, and can still be a handsome prince again!
By Johnny Philips on 10/30/2009
11) Don't be a deadbeat; pay your bills and don't steal engineering.
By Eye in the Sky on 11/6/2009
There may be some merit to eliminating most of the small AM radio stations and bringing back the clears. Before that happens though, we need to stop using double sideband with full carrier. Instead the carrier and one of the sidebands should be supressed. This will double the number of channels that are available allowing for more clears. If you want to put up an AM radio station you will operate with 50kw of single sideband AM and will be expected to cover the lower 48 states at night. Your antenna will be required to be a full .64 wavelength tall over 120 ground mounted radials or the equivalent of raised radials. We should end religious broading because it A. puts everyone to sleep, B. gives AM radio a bad name. Anyone who has been pro-iboc should be thrown out of the industry on their keysters. What percentage of people, under the age of 30 have actually listened to AM radio? How many of them would know how to? How many would want to?
By Charles River on 10/13/2009

Post your comment

Your Name: Required
Your Mail:    Email is used only to display Gravatar
Your Site:   
Comment Info:         

Posts are reviewed before publication, typically the next business morning. Radio World encourages multiple viewpoints, though a post will be blocked if it contains abusive language, or is repetitive or spam. Thank you for commenting!